| Austin seeing interest from California companies ‘double or triple,’ chamber says | It is not about gun control; it’s about people control. |
From California: Why College Campuses Should Allow Concealed Carry
Of course the only reason you need is “because the second amendment gives us that right” and state governments have most definitely infringed on that right.
Via the Stanford Review out in far-left California:
Here in the Bay Area, the general response to gun ownership is an automatic “no,” and the Stanford campus is no exception. Our campus sees minimal violence and our main exposure to firearms is through the news, where killings are stories rather than the cases with peaceful endings.
This anti-gun bias is reflected in campus policy and state law. On its website, Stanford University Department of Public Safety (SUDPS) states that “all [firearms] are prohibited on Stanford Campus … except for sworn police officers,” and California has mandated absolute firearm bans on all college campuses. These policies assume that guns are fundamentally harmful. Remembering that a weapon is simply a powerful tool that can be used for self-defense as well as for harm, we need to reconsider Stanford’s “Gun-Free Zone” policy.
Absolute bans are ineffective, as criminals carry weapons regardless of their legality. Worse, Gun-Free Zones are uniquely attractive targets, as a monopoly of force is in the hands of whoever is willing to break the law, and police response is often too little and too late…
[snip]
…It is wrong to disarm an individual when effective protection cannot be provided in compensation, and relying on police officers and security guards has proven to be insufficient. When targets of violence, people have the right to options beyond waiting for help to come.
Related Posts
- 5/11/2011 -- Shooting Leaves Three Dead in the Gun-Free Zone of San Jose State University (122)
- 5/17/2011 -- Wet-Their-Pants Liberals Freak Out at Thought of Campus Concealed Carry (3)
- 4/6/2013 -- Dewhurst is Right…and Wrong…About Arming Texas Teachers (1)
- 4/3/2012 -- One L. Goh and Why Gun-Free Zones Are the Most Dangerous Place for Honest, Law Abiding Citizens (5)
- 5/29/2013 -- Britain wants its guns back (0)
Email This Post
⋅
Print This Post

One quibble.
should read
Very true.
How about “because the second amendment recognizes that we are given that right.”