What Media Bias — Journalist Cheering for Obama
Posted by Robbie Cooper on August 29th, 2008 | TrackbackMoments later Olbermann named Fox News the “Worst Person in the World” for being unbiased and “way too mean to the Chosen one.”
Moments later Olbermann named Fox News the “Worst Person in the World” for being unbiased and “way too mean to the Chosen one.”
The Liberal Houston Chronicle not just shilling for the hometown Democrat candidate (Rick Noriega), but making up lies while attacking Sen. John Cornyn (R).
NBC reporters just don’t know how to report US victories as victories — instead they try to find a way to spin them into losses of failures.
What’s funny is watching the Left, despite the shivers for Obama running up and down their legs, try to maintain the facade of “unbiased” and “objective” reporting and analysis.
The media love affair with Obama — who they are absolutely trying to get elected (it’s all a part of their narrative) — began a long time ago. Long before this latest invite only knob-slob foreign photo-op and faux interview junket.
Gotta love the unbiased headline writing going on at the Houston Chronicle — try not to let your Liberal bias shine through too much, fellas.
You would think that honest journalism would lead with a story about how an overwhelming majority of Soldiers will be voting — as they ALWAYS do — for the Republican candidate.
Only in Media-spin land would losing be considered winning. Especially when writing about the Chosen One.
REPUBLICAN BIKER GANG MEMBER ASSAULTS AFRICAN IMMIGRANT AND STEALS HIS LUNCH.
This week, his National Affairs column (Rolling Stone Issue 1049), Taibbi breaks down “Hillary’s Flimsy Case” — and even this Obama-fellator is starting to see through the smoke-and-mirror campaign of Obama.
I’m sure that the 90% of college professors that are Liberal don’t understand what the problem is here….
Pretend for a moment if the same story broke about Texas Governor Rick Perry — do you believe for one moment that the word “Republican” wouldn’t be somewhere in the first sentence, if not the headline?
The NY Times would rather we grant citizenship to people who sneaked into our country illegally than to grant “natural born citizen” status to one of our nation’s great war heroes and long-time Senator because he was born on a US Military base (to American parents) in Panama.
Why can’t we just call a fanatical Muslim a fanatical Muslim (Ok, not we, because I have absolutely zero hesitation in doing so.