Well, of course, without having to read the article I can boil it down for you in one key difference: the Tea Partiers lover America; the Occupy whiners & losers don’t.

Tea Party vs OWS

But much more via Big Journalism:

Two weeks ago, I responded to the mainstream media labeling the Occupy Wall Street protests the left-wing version of the Tea Party. Apparently the reasons given to prove that comparison false were too vague for the media to understand, because they continue to  make that comparison.

So to be helpful to the people in the “fourth estate,” I have created sort of a “difference between the Occupy Wall Street Protests, and the Tea Party Movement” guide for idiots and the Mainstream Media. It follows below:

[snip]

In the end the, difference between Occupy Wall Street and the tea party is very similar to the difference between the President and his progressive supporters versus conservative Americans.  Just like Occupy Wall Street, the progressives believe that American institutions need to be defaced and torn down; maybe the progressives don’t attack police cars, but they attack our freedoms.

Conservatives believe that tapping the drive of the American people is the best way to clean up our problems.  For example, they believe that the best way to clean up the economy is to make it easier for Americans to run their own businesses. On the other hand, both the progressives and the Occupy Wall Street Protesters believe that it is government’s job to clean up their messes.

Conservatives and the tea party both believe in American exceptionalism; we would never travel the world apologizing for America the way President Obama did, and we would never deface representations of that exceptionalism such as “Old Glory” the way the Occupy Wall Street movement did.

 
Kendra Marr

Now what's she going to do with that worthless BA in Journalism?

Of course the article says she ‘resigned,’ but that’s only because they were going to fire her if she didn’t.

So…welcome to the 99%, Ms. Kendra Marr. I’m sure there’s a urine-stained sleeping bag waiting for you at the plaza in the OWS or Occupy DC homeless camps, where you too are now free at last to lash out at the ‘man’ and blame him (whomever he is) for all your failures and woes. Don’t worry, honey, in the drug- and degenerate sex-filled Occupy camps, nobody is held responsible for their role in their shitty little lives…it’s always someone else’s fault.

Via Politico:

Editors’ note: One of the inviolable principles of journalism, one we live by at POLITICO, is that the work we publish must be genuinely our own. Whenever we must rely on reporting or ideas that were first produced by others, our policy is to cite and/or link to these sources by name, and aim to be fully transparent with our audience. In all other instances, our readers deserve full confidence that the reporting and writing in POLITICO is original. We learned Thursday of a case where a reporter published work in POLITICO that fell short of this bright line. We are taking action in response, including this explanation of what happened to our readers.

Of course, if the editors of Politico were truly interested in being honest and transparent with their readers, they’d admit their institutional Liberal bias…but I’m not holding my breath on that one.

This commenter agrees: “They should fire ALL of Politico for journalistic malpractice for being nothing more than a stenographer service for the current president.” Exactly.

From Marr’s bio page, which is still up at Politico:

Marr grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area. She earned her bachelor’s degree in journalism and international studies at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill.

Any doubt she’s a hard-Left Liberal? How on earth is she ever going to repay her loans on her BA in Journalism (the new Under Water Basket Weaving of worthless degrees).

 

Pretty good debate tonight. In which Gov. Rick Perry cemented his front-runner status while simultaneously serving as everybody (except Newt’s) piñata.

And he handled it well. He did seem a bit off his stride, being the newest kid on the campaign trail, but was still good enough to win handily, and he’ll only get stronger. If the winner of the debate was judged on applause from the audience, then Gov. Perry was the clear winner.

Perhaps the biggest take away from the debate tonight in the Reagan Library? Brian Williams and whoever the other Liberal hack from Politico really hate Texas.

The most stunningly unprofessional and exasperatingly biased question from Williams was when he asked Gov Perry if he had trouble sleeping at night, wondering if any of the 234 executions in the State of Texas might have been an innocent person.

Williams seemed genuinely stunned that the audience cheered when he mentioned the number of executions in Texas.

And then the audience cheered Perry’s response even louder.

If you come into our state and you kill one of our children, you kill a police officer, you’re involved with another crime and you kill one of our citizens, you will face the ultimate justice in the State of Texas. And that is you will be executed.

Which made Liberals anti-DP bleeding hearts everywhere explode.

Visit the Right Scoop to see the video.

This commenter at Right Scoop is dead on:

Williams was going for a “gotcha” question and Perry came back with a steely-eyed response that shows the strength of his convictions. His unapologetic response shows an unwavering commitment to his morals and values and how he will demonstration them as President when faced with difficult and important decisions in regard to the American citizens best interest.

And here’s why Liberals were so stunned by the cheering in the audience over the execution of evil men: They’re always stunned when they run into the fact that the majority of Americans disagree with their myopic world view.

But there’s something more to it…something…sicker. Remember the movie The Life of David Gale, starring Kevin Spacey? Well, anti-DP Liberals, especially the anti-DP liberal journalists like The Texas Tribune’s very own Brandi Grissom, actually want Texas to have executed an innocent man.

Think about that for a moment, and think about the sick kind of person who wants that to be true, just because it will 1) advance their anti-DP agenda, and 2) it gives ‘em something salacious to write about for their Liberal rags.

Watching my twitter feed moments after the debate it was almost comical to watch a bevy of Liberal Journalists, many from Texas, completely dismayed that people cheered for…death!

UPDATE:

Here’s the second best moment of the night, when Newt went after Politico editor John F. Harris for being a snarky little biased Liberal hack pretending to be an important “journalist:”

 

Matt Taibbi --- Political Hack

I’ve blasted Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone numerous times on this blog for being a myopic, dishonest, blatantly biased hack of a journalist. Remember he’s the punk who wanted to rip out McCain’s throat to defend Obama’s “honor” (back before the new civility ushered in the wake of the Tuscon shooting).

Well, not only has Obama lost Richard Cohen and the Hamptons, but now he’s lost one of the most Liberally biased far left “journalist” around in Matt Taibbi, who basically comes out and calls Obama a liar in his latest Rolling Stone column: Obama and Jobs: Why I Don’t Believe Him Anymore

I was hours early for a flight and stuck in a relatively small terminal crammed with people. Only one area in the whole wing had empty seats; an unused gate that contained a TV blaring the CNN broadcast of Obama’s Labor Day speech at full volume.

So it was either sit underneath a full-volume broadcast of our fearless president bellowing out his latest hollow promises, or the hellish alternative: retreat to gates full of screaming five year-old children, all of them jacked up on sugar and bawling their eyes out because it was the end of Labor Day weekend and their cruel parents were dragging them home from Disneyworld.

I ended up choosing the screaming children.

If I had to chose sitting next to Matt Taibbi at an airport bar with free drinks and pretty waitresses or sitting at the gates full of screaming five year-old kids? I’d have chosen the screaming kids, too.

Obama hasn’t been a total disaster on labor. Most notably, he stepped up in the Wisconsin mess and at least took sides in that debate, calling the push to end collective bargaining rights an “assault” on unions.

But I remember following Obama on the campaign trail and hearing all sorts of promises before union-heavy crowds. He said he would raise the minimum wage every year; he said he would fight free-trade agreements. He also talked about repealing the Bush tax cuts and ending tax breaks for companies that move jobs overseas.

It’s not just that he hasn’t done those things. The more important thing is that the people he’s surrounded himself with are not labor people, but stooges from Wall Street. Barack Obama has as his chief of staff a former top-ranking executive from one of the most grossly corrupt mega-companies on earth, JP Morgan Chase. He sees Bill Daley in his own office every day, yet when it comes time to talk abut labor issues, he has to go out and make selected visits twice a year or whatever to the Richard Trumkas of the world.

Listening to Obama talk about jobs and shared prosperity yesterday reminded me that we are back in campaign mode and Barack Obama has started doing again what he does best – play the part of a progressive. He’s good at it. It sounds like he has a natural affinity for union workers and ordinary people when he makes these speeches. But his policies are crafted by representatives of corporate/financial America, who happen to entirely make up his inner circle.

I just don’t believe this guy anymore, and it’s become almost painful to listen to him.

Welcome to reality, Matty. Though, you share some blame here, buddy. As you and your rag tirelessly cheerleaded Obama as the next Messiah and did your unethical best to make sure he got elected. And, despite what you write here and now, when push comes to shove next November? You’ll step into the ballot box and vote for him. Again. Which makes you a bigger idiot than Obama.

 

Because nobody else in the on-their-knees Obama media has the balls (or journalistic integrity) to do this. H/T to Matt Lewis:

As Ace says, “Carney looks even douchier than usual.”

In case you missed Obama’s warm up act in his Pro-Labor, anti-American speech in the failed city of Detroit (failed because big union labor destroyed the auto industry, and Democrat policies killed…well, everything else in the Motor City), Jimmy Hoffa once again exhorted his union goons to inflict violence on behalf of Obama:

“President Obama, this is your army, we are ready to march,” Hoffa said. “But everybody here’s got to vote. If we go back, and keep the eye on the prize, let’s take these son of a bitches out.”

I say we give these pathetic cowards the war that they’re itching for. An eye for an eye. A broken leg for every broken leg they break. A curb stomped head for every curb stomped head they inflict. I agree with Hoff in tone…let’s do take these sons of bitches out (metaphorically, just as Hoffa meant it…)

 
Nagin's legacy of hurricane preparedness

This is the legacy of Mayor Nagin's "hurricane preparedness" and failed leadership.

While Liberals are busy trying to blame Conservatives, the Tea Party, and Global Warming for Hurricane Irene, the Mensa members over at MSNBC decided to bring the Mayor of Chocolate City, Ray Nagin, into their studios to discuss hurricane preparedness.

No. Seriously.

Stop laughing. They really did.

Never before has a city been more unprepared for a disaster they knew was on the way. And never before has a city leader been more incompetent in days leading up to the disaster or in the weeks that followed than was New Orleans and Ray Nagin. He should have been arrested for his negligence in New Orleans — both before and after Hurricane Katrina.

Getting hurricane preparedness tips from Ray Nagin is like getting matrimonial fidelity tips from Tiger Woods or Bill Clinton. It’s like getting diet and exercise advice from Michael Moore. It’s like getting tips on how to be a good husband from John Edwards. Or how to handle a Twitter scandal from Anthony Weiner.

For fuck’s sake, you might as well ask King Barrack Slayer of Growth™ how to create jobs.

What next? MSNBC will have their network star, Roger Madcow, give a seminar on fair, unbiased, and objective journalism?

Go ahead and join in the mockery, it’s fun and easy: Getting hurricane preparedness advice from Ray Nagin is like…

Aug 262011
 

This was up a few days ago, pulled, and now it’s back.

 

This is the kind of reporting that drives me insane (and is an actual danger to the community this news org is supposed to be serving):

Police are looking for a man who stabbed a pedestrian on Long Island after asking him for a dollar.

Nassau County police say the 27-year-old victim was walking on Nassau Road in Roosevelt Monday evening when the suspect approached and asked him for one dollar.

The victim said he didn’t have any money and continued walking.

Police say the suspect followed him and then pulled out a knife and stabbed him in the stomach and hand multiple times.

A passing motorist scared the suspect off.

The victim was taken to a local hospital where he was listed in stable condition.

The suspect is described as being about 5’7″ with a medium build. He was last seen wearing a red and black New York Yankees cap with a black hooded sweatshirt and jeans, police said.

Anyone with information is asked to call Crime Stoppers at (800) 244-TIPS. All callers will remain anonymous.

Hmmm…what other piece of information could NBC New York have provided that might more easily help the community identify this dangerous attacker? Since the race of the attacker is not given, I think it’s safe to assume that is because he was black.

In fact, I’d put my next paycheck up against the editor of NBC New York’s that the perp is black.

 

FirebaggerDoug Ross: “That’s right: the progressive Left — the true Soviet wing of the Democrat Party — doesn’t think Obama is destroying the country fast enough.”

Doug is referring to this:

The Obama campaign’s point person in New Mexico recently sent an email to supporters defending the president’s position on the debt deal and bashing the Nobel Prize winning New York Times columnist Paul Krugman and the “Firebagger Lefty blogosphere.”

The reality that President Obama is seeking re-election while the left wing of his party is profoundly disillusioned hit home last week at the Iowa State Fair when I watched DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz get heckled off stage by angry progressives. And Obama’s re-election campaign staff isn’t helping their boss much.

[Snip]

To have the Obama re-election team trashing Krugman and Firedoglake ought to give you an idea of what a sense of hopeless doom the Democrats are facing as they look forward to 2012. FDL wouldn’t be trashing Obama if Obama wasn’t looking weak, and Obama’s staff wouldn’t be worried about a columnist or a blogger if the White House was generally winning the message war.

Just as nothing succeeds like success, nothing fails like failure. Ever since Obama got his ass kicked in the 2010 mid-terms, he has been covered in failure, and the negative mojo appears to be snowballing.

Blue 0n Blue cat fight. Gotta love it.

One of the dumbest (unexpectedly!) responses comes form the Washington Post’s Wonder Boy and Obama Butt Boy, Ezra Klein, who writes:

Greg Sargent has a nice take on the e-mail an Obama campaign official sent mocking Paul Krugman and the “firebaggers.” But whenever I read these periodic eruptions about “the professional left,” my main thought is: if I were a member of the professional left, I would be stoked.

Emphasis mine. IF? If….what the fuck do you mean IF, you douchenozzle Liberal sycophant? You are the freak’n poster boy for “the professional Left.”

Apparently Politico’s Ben Smith doesn’t realize that he’s part of that exact same firebagging Professional Left.

Lots of hand-wringing from the rest of the Professional Left and Firebaggers over at Memeorandum.

Like this from far-left unhinged blogger Americablog:

He also refers to the blogosphere as “the ideologue sphere,” and suggests that we’re “fanatic” and full of “hysteria.”  Funny, the Obama campaign didn’t feel that way about us in 2008 when they repeatedly asked us to do their dirty work for them, and we gladly, and quietly, did.

We all knew Obama’s 2008 campaign was dirty. Thanks for admitting as much.

 

Feign surprise.

Ed Schultz is a douchenozzle and a complete hack. Which makes him a perfect example of the type of “journalism” practiced over at MSNBC, where these types of outright lies and intentional slander are the norm.

Via Breitbart.tv:

Ed Schultz used a deceptive edit to misinform his audience about the content of Gov. Rick Perry’s speech in Iowa yesterday. Schultz claimed that Gov. Perry was calling President Obama a “black cloud hanging over America” when in fact, the governor was talking about the national debt.

 

The Palinization of Rick Perry by Obama’s sycophant and compliant media is in full swing. Being led mostly by the George Soros-funded Texas Tribune (but…but…but…they’re an “unbiased” media organization [my ass]) and the real-men-make-them-wet-their-panties boys over at Politico.

Perry is going to run on (and win with) his record on job creation and the relatively vibrant Texas economy during Obama’s “black cloud” over the rest of America’s economy. Which means that the Journolisters and their minions will be attacking it as though all of those jobs are some kind of smoke and mirrors myth.

Which means that real Conservatives, honest Texans, and Rick Perry supporters have to be prepared to defend our state’s remarkable record in the face of all of these lies and to the contrary. And a great place to start is right here in this remarkably researched and written piece at Political Math, where he concludes:

My point is to show that most of the “excuses” you will hear about Texas’ job statistics are based in nothing more than a hope that Rick Perry had nothing to do with them and not on a sound understanding of the data.

My advice to anti-Perry advocates is this: Give up talking about Texas jobs. Texas is an incredible outlier among the states when it comes to jobs. Not only are they creating them, they’re creating ones with higher wages.

Go read the entire thing. And be sure to share it with all of your Liberal friends and neighbors who are trying to tell you that things in Texas are much, much worse than your lying eyes can see.

 

Of course, there’s more to that statement…but that one quip right there is the closest I’ve ever come to agreeing with the Boy Wonder.

Interesting debate going on at this Google+ post by the Washington Post’s boy wonder and George Soros mouth piece, Ezra Klein (with a link to this article by the boy wonder in the Washington Post).

Ezra, who has all the schooling in the world, but has never actually had a real job doing any of the things he fancies himself an expert on, intros his piece thusly:

There are now two sides in the American tax debate: the Republican Party, which refuses to have a serious conversation about taxes, and the Democratic Party, which .?.?. refuses to have a serious conversation about taxes.

Let’s start here: We cannot fund anything close to the government’s commitments if we don’t raise taxes, or if we let only the Bush tax cuts for income over $250,000 expire. And that’s true even if we make deep cuts across all categories of federal spending.

My initial response to The Boy Wonder was this:

Ezra said, “Let’s start here: We cannot fund anything close to the government’s commitments if we don’t raise taxes.”

Which is true. But the answer is NOT to raise more revenue to meet those ever growing commitments (or, as others might call them pork spending, entitlements, excessive government growth). The answer is to seriously reduce the size and scope of the government’s commitments.

Which means cuts. Huge deep cuts. Across the board, every part of government. And then start eliminating entire agencies and departments that are not necessary or needed in the federal government: Dept. of Education and Dept of Energy would be good starts.

The comments on the Google+ post though have been taken over by a couple of seriously unhinged and under-medicated Liberal whackos (are there any other kind?). Especially this nut, who simply goes by Joe C. I’ve cobbled together a few of his comments here so you can get a taste of the very tainted kool-aid these kids are drinking.

JoeC on Google PlusIn the next comment, crazy Joe sounds like he has Al Gore’s hand up his butt and is moving his lips for him like the pathetic little Liberal puppet that he is:

Joe C on Google PlusFeign surprise — Joe wants to legalize drugs, too. That way he can sit on his mom’s living room couch all afternoon getting baked (and collecting government checks) without feeling so paranoid about being busted.

And typical asshat Liberals like Joe C (and the others in this thread) are exactly why we can’ get a long; why there cannot be a compromise with you. We do not share the same values; we do no share the same love of country. We do not have the same definition of the words fair, hard work, integrity, or democracy.

© 2010 UrbanGrounds

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha