Illegal Immigrant, Drunk on Prospect of Amnesty and a Gallon of Tequila, Kills Houston Sheriff

 Posted by on 5/20/2013  4 Responses »
May 202013
 
Andres Munos - cop-killing illegal immigrant

Illegal immigrant, Andres Munos: is this what it takes to finally get deported back to Mexico (or Honduras, or Guatemala, or whatever third-world pisshole he came from)?

But mostly from the tequila…

Few stories infuriate me off more than this one.

Few incidents make me madder at the pro-open-borders politicians who are responsible for letting shit like this happen in our country.

Sunday morning, just outside of Houston, TX, Sgt. Dwayne Polk, 47, a 16-veteran of the Harris County Sheriff’s Office, was killed by a drunk driver who ran a red light and drove his pickup truck into the driver’s side door of Sheriff Polk’s SUV.

The driver, Andres Munos, 22, is an illegal immigrant (or as the PC-pussies at the Houston Chronicle put it, he “lives in Houston but is not a U.S. citizen”). That’s bad enough that this illegal piece of shit killed a cop. That’s all on him and not on the politicians who refuse to secure our borders.

Oh wait…it is on them.

Munos had been arrested once before, in 2012, for DWI and and unlawfully carrying a weapon. Was he deported then? Nope, he served 30 days in county jail and then was released back into our community.

A drunk-driving, illegal-gun wielding illegal alien that we had in custody. Was simply released back onto our streets.

I wonder how long he’ll be in jail this time — for killing a cop while driving drunk? A year? Maybe 2? And then I’m sure our (in)justice department will simply return him to the streets of Houston, rather than deport this worthless piece-of-shit back to the third-world shithole he came from.

Edgar Casas — Another Illegal Immigrant Who Came to America to Make a Better Life for Himself. And to Rape Our Women and Children.

 Posted by on 4/30/2013  27 Responses »
Apr 302013
 
Edgar Casas

Edgar Casas — raping the women and children that American sexual deviants are too lazy to rape.

UPDATE – Well,  I was wrong. Casas never did make it to back to Mexico (too bad, then he would have been there problem, not ours). He was arrested last night.

___________________

Attention Austin/Central Texas people: have you seen this Mexican?

But mostly to rape our women and children.

Edgar Casas is accused of sexually assaulting at least eight women around Austin and is also wanted for the aggravated sexual assault of a child.

According to Austin Police Department, the suspect is described as a Hispanic man in his 20s. He is between 5’4” to 5’7” and has a thin build. He has short, dark, possibly wavy hair and a light complexion. Oh, and he doesn’t speak English — just Spanish.

You know who else is typically 1) in their 20s, 2) in the United States, and 3) can’t speak English? Illegal immigrants, that’s who. Just remember, if Obama and Rubio get their way, this pervert will get amnesty AND welfare. The better with which to fund his raping lifestyle (on your dime).

So, good luck finding Edgar, Chief Acevedo — he’s already back home in Mexico (where he’ll likely continue raping women and children).

Senate Democrats Vote to Extend Obamacare to Illegal Immigrants

 Posted by on 3/25/2013  6 Responses »
Mar 252013
 

Feign surprise. Democrats simply see illegal immigrants as future (or present) Democrat voters. So they’ll do anything to pander to ‘em. Including giving them more free stuff and entitlements than most US citizens qualify for.

From Twitter:

Why don’t we just give them the right to vote, welfare checks, subsidized housing, and free education for their anchor children? Oh…wait…

Via Roll Call:

The Senate’s bipartisan immigration working group split along party lines during a contentious budget vote to prevent illegal immigrants who receive legal status from receiving federal health benefits.

The Senate early Saturday morning defeated the amendment to the budget resolution which would have put the Senate on record as opposing access to health care under Medicaid or the Affordable Care Act for undocumented immigrants who get a green card.

The amendment, which failed 43 to 56, was offered by Senate Budget ranking member Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.

All Democrats — including gang members Dick Durbin of Illinois, Bob Menendez of New Jersey, Charles E. Schumer of New York and Michael Bennet of Colorado — opposed the amendment. They were joined by Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska. All other Republicans — including immigration negotiators Marco Rubio of Florida, John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Jeff Flake of Arizona — supported the amendment.

The “gang of eight” has been negotiating a comprehensive immigration overhaul package that they hope to unveil when the Senate returns the week of April 8 from spring recess.

And more Twitter reacts to the news:

As noted above, I believe that this actually is a poison pill be the Democrats to kill amnesty (right now, they’d prefer the muscle and dollars from the unions than the support of Hispanics ..who Democrats know will continue to vote for them no matter how often or how much they shit on them).

Does the MFM Know the Difference Between LEGAL and ILLEGAL Immigration?

 Posted by on 1/30/2013  7 Responses »
Jan 302013
 

What’s missing from this headline and story by Julie Chang over at The Austin Sanctuary-City-Statesman?

Two men, juvenile accused of stealing truck to smuggle immigrants

Two men and a juvenile have been arrested after police say they stole a truck to smuggle immigrants, according to arrest affidavits.

Oscar Hernandez-Villanueva, 18, and Rosalio Tovar-Torres, 30, were charged with engaging in organized criminal activity — theft.

On Tuesday, Austin police were conducting surveillance on a 2003 Yukon Denali, which they said in the affidavit had been involved in several large truck thefts in the past. The trucks were stolen for human smuggling, police said in the affidavit.

You can read the rest of the report if you’d like to…but I’ll save you the trouble. The key word missing from this report and headline? Everybody…all at once: ILLEGAL!

I believe the word you’re looking for is ill-fucking-legal. As in “criminal trespass.”

Reading their story, you might be under the impression that these young Canadian men (Hernandez-Villanueva and Tovar-Torres are Canadian surnames, right?) were doing little more than giving a lift to a bunch of their fellow Canadian friends who were also totally-legally in the States. Their only crime, really, was stealing a truck.

The word you’re missing is ILLEGAL, Julie Chang (who, given her surname, might also very well be an “immigrant.” Or perhaps her parents were. If she, or they are “immigrants,” statistically they are much, much more likely to be LEGAL immigrants. You’d think a possible immigrant from China [or possibly Korea] would be pissed about a bunch of ILLEGAL immigrants encroaching on her LEGAL immigrant status).

Ms. Chang also interned in Washington, D.C., working on the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

I Don’t Give a Damned if Your Illegal Ass is Deported, Even If You Have Anchor Babies

 Posted by on 1/7/2013  5 Responses »
Jan 072013
 

NOTE: This story is from mid-December last year, but I’m just now getting around to finishing it up and clearing out my Draft folder.
_________________________

anchor baby

Sorry, kiddo, but if you’re mom’s an illegal she’s gotta go. Don’t worry, though mi hijo, you can go with her.

KVUE News posted this story last month, which I guess was supposed to make me feel sorry for this illegal immigrant mother (who also happens to be a convicted thief) who is now being deported back to Mexico — with or without her anchor babies.

Sorry, KVUE, but my give-a-damned is all dried up.

A North Texas mother who completed her probation for stealing merchandise from a Macy’s in 2010 has been ordered to leave the country. Her children are sick and she is now trying to appeal to ICE with medical records so she can stay with her children. ICE said a child’s health is something agents consider when determining whether someone should be deported.

In 8 years she has had 3 anchor babies, but not bothered to learn English. She was a criminal when she sneaked into this country and continues to be a criminal as proven by the theft. The kids can stay here with family, but she can go home.

Her kids and her sad story are not my problem (well, except for the part where I’m helping foot the bill for their medical expenses).

Send her back to Mexico.

Her choice to take the kids or not. And I hope she tells her tale of woe far and wide (in Mexico), as a warning to any and all other Mexican parents that they too might be forced to abandon their children because of their choices. I hope it scares them into either 1) entering the US legally, or 2) staying put in Mexico and working to improve their country, rather then coming here to drag down ours.

Obama’s War on SCOTUS and Enacting De Facto Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants

 Posted by on 6/26/2012  3 Responses »
Jun 262012
 

When Obama was sworn into office he promised to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”. We also expect him to uphold and enforce the laws of this country that have been duly passed.

As it turns you, he’s doing neither:

Just to make sure I’m clear on the Obama administration’s immigration policy:

If you can manage to get past the drug cartels, dangerous desert crossings, and the way-too-few Border Patrol Agents, you’re home free. You will not be arrested, detained, or deported even though you are in our country illegally. And don’t worry about those pesky state and city police officers — we have stripped them of their ability to do anything to you. Oh, and make sure to stop by your local elementeray school to sign up for free school for your kids, then head over to the welfare office to make sure you’re stocked up on free health care, affordable (or FREE!) housing, and don’t forget to grab your BET card on the way out the door. Welcome to America, Amigos (and don’t forget to vote Democrat, early and often, at the next election).

Via Right Scoop: ‘We now have de facto amnesty’ – Mark Levin on the SCOTUS Arizona Law ruling

Yep. That’s exactly what it is. If you can make it across the border and promise not to commit any additional crimes, you can stay and not be hassled, arrested, or deported.

But just because Obama refuses to do his job (too busy campaigning, fundraising, and playing golf), doesn’t mean that we have to simply stand by and watch him open up our borders. Via Real Clear Politics — Sheriff Joe Arpaio: “I’m Not Stopping Anything”

“I’m not stopping anything. I’m going to continue to enforce those state laws regardless of what the federal government is trying to put pressure on me to satisfy all these activists, which by the way are in front of my building right now.”

“Three and half years they’ve been in front of my building. So, I’m not going to bend to the federal government, especially when we still have state laws to enforce.”

Twitter Reaction:

https://twitter.com/ToddKincannon/status/217334276520280066

And my favorite:

Ted Cruz and David Dewhurst Respond to SCOTUS Decision on Immigration

 Posted by on 6/25/2012  2 Responses »
Jun 252012
 

I’m firmly on Team Cruz right now — David Dewhurst has done some commendable work during his time as Lt. Governor of Texas, but he’s also been too quick and too eager to work with Liberals to derail popular Conservative issues (TSA groping, state income tax, sanctuary cities), and he’s just not that exciting of a candidate.

But after reading each candidates’ response to the SCOTUS decision on the Arizon immigration law (and the Obama administration’s reaction to it), I’m going to have to give Dewhurst the edge in their responses:

Dewhurst responds to SCOTUS decision

Dewhurst hits a few key points here that I fully agree with and support:

  • Allowing those who patrol our borders to fight back — the Mexican cartels are armed and dangerous and don’t mind shooting first. Our Border Patrol agents need to be better armed and have much more aggressive rules of engagement.
  • Allow states to help fight illegal immigration and, if they’re a border state, to help defend that border.
  • And NO pathway to citizenship for those who are here illegally.

And here’s Cruz’ response (via Ramparts 360, as I couldn’t find the statement on Cruz’ web site):

“The federal government is utterly failing to secure our borders. When Arizona stepped in to address out-of-control illegal immigration, liberal groups attacked Arizona and the Obama Administration sued the State. Rather than actually enforce our Nation’s immigration laws—which is the President’s explicit constitutional obligation—President Obama instead asked the Supreme Court to strike down Arizona’s law.”

“Today, the Supreme Court upheld the central provision of the Arizona law. Although the Court unfortunately struck down other provisions of the Arizona law, the Court held that there is no barrier in federal law to States’ requiring local law enforcement to check on the immigration status of those criminally detained. This makes clear that sanctuary cities exist only because of state and local decision-making; it highlights that we have sanctuary cities in Texas only because Lt. Gov. Dewhurst killed the bill that would have ended sanctuary cities. Had the Texas Legislature passed that bill—had Lt. Governor Dewhurst not run from the fight and prevented its passage—then today’s decision would have upheld that Texas law as well.”

“We need leaders who will get serious about enforcing the border: triple the border patrol; use walls, fences, and technology; end sanctuary cities; repeal Obama’s newly ordered amnesty; and end benefits like in-state tuition for illegal aliens.”

This is one issue where both candidates should have gone on the attack against the proper target — the Obama administration and the Democrat party. Instead, Cruz took bad aim and fired an unnecessary shot at David Dewhurst. That actually made me squirm a little bit. While Dewhurst does have some answering for killing the sanctuary city legislation last session, he is not the enemy of our open and porous borders.

Obama’s Illegal Back-Door Amnesty Program For Illegal Immigrants

 Posted by on 6/16/2012  8 Responses »
Jun 162012
 

The big story yesterday was Obama (once again) making an end run around Congress and (once again) attempting to consolidate the legislative powers granted to Congress under our Constitution with his executive powers.

It’s almost like the alleged Constitutional Law professor knows nothing at all about the Constitution. Almost…

Instead of working on immigration reform with the House and Senate majorities he enjoyed during his first two years, instead of working with his Senate majority and a GOP House…Obama has instead decided to take another shit on the Constitution and use an executive order to define immigration policy.

As Texas GOP Senate candidate Ted Cruz said, Obama’s new back-door amnesty is “cravenly political, lawless, and wrong.” Charles Krauthammer calls it “out-and-out lawlessness.”

Obama’s executive order would grant amnesty (in the guise of work permits) to up to 800K illegal immigrants aged 15-30. Lot’s of great reactions over on Twitter yesterday and today (I’ve sprinkled some of them throughout this post).

Yep…Romney needs to make sure to hammer Obama on this, and to make sure voters know that he will immediately repeal Obama’s illegal executive order as soon as he takes office.

Of course, the media would like you to think that the biggest controversy yesterday wasn’t a President stomping on the Constitution, but rather a reporter, The Daily Caller’s Neil Munro, daring to call him out on it and (gasp), actually ask him a question during Obama’s press conference.

Yes, Kat…that’s exactly what the media’s agenda is.

Munro’s question threw Obama off of his prepared comments, which of course caused the skin-thinned Obama to go off on the reporter for daring to do his job…

Obama chastised Munro for interrupting, telling him “now is not the time for questions.” Implying that there would be a time for questions when Obama was done. But of course, that didn’t turn out to be true:

Typical coward. And speaking of President Skin-thin:

And a few more reactions:

Kudos to Munro for actually acting like a journalist while the rest of the MFM simply keeps licking Obama’s boots:

And then there’s the most important question that was asked on Twitter (that no reporter would dare ask The Won):

How Bad is the US Economy? Residents of the Failed Mexican Narco-State no Longer Fleeing Here in Droves for a ‘Better Life’

 Posted by on 4/25/2012  4 Responses »
Apr 252012
 
Mexican workers

Adios, amigos. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way home.

Well, if there’s one unintended positive from Obama’s deliberate attempt to destroy the American economy, he’s done what no other President in quite some time has been able or willing to do: curb the uncontested flow of illegal immigrants into our country.

The Washington Post Headline: For first time since Depression, more Mexicans leave U.S. than enter

A four-decade tidal wave of Mexican immigration to the United States has receded, causing a historic shift in migration patterns as more Mexicans appear to be leaving the United States for Mexico than the other way around, according to a report from the Pew Hispanic Center.

It looks to be the first reversal in the trend since the Depression, and experts say that a declining Mexican birthrate and other factors may make it permanent.

And what other factors could they be talking about? Effectively, that Obama has so decimated our economy, destroyed so many jobs, ravished the new home construction industry, that there’s not even enough “jobs Americans are too lazy to do” for illegal immigrants to risk their lives crossing the most dangerous border in the world (with the possible exception of the Israel/Palestine border).

 Older Entries