Once again, a case of way too much government and way too much regulation interfering with the free market and the exchanging of goods and services.

 

I see no reason this should take 15 years to implement. Within 15 years, there should be zero reason to even have a public postal service. Hell, we’re just about at that point now.

 

The Resident-in-Chief is an idiot. There really isn’t any other way to put it.

 

I agree with John. I think our country, in it’s current state, is doomed. We are quickly approaching a tipping point when the shit will hit the fan if we don’t start to reverse this trend. And quickly

 

When I first read Bloomberg’s headline — Government Shutdown Opposed by Americans in Poll Faulting Republican Cuts,— I thought, “Heck…they should be blaming Democrat spending not the Republican cuts to their out-of-control, spend-it-like-it’s-not-your-money spending.”

 

Of course that’s not the headline the props at the Washington Post wrote. Instead Lori Montgomery at the Washington Post breathlessly repeats the latest George Soros talking point that the GOP spending plan would “cost 700K jobs.”

 

That’s not good enough, John. We want you do drastically cut spending. Deep, deep, deep significant cuts. Not symbolic cuts that don’t actually put a fraction of a dent in our national deficit.

 

Those ‘draconian’ budget cuts that Obama is threatening to veto? Yeah…not quite as draconian as he would have you believe (it’s almost like he doesn’t understand what that actually means). No…not draconian…rather budget cuts.

 

I particularly enjoyed the explanation of the federal deficit using Jack Daniels

 

And they said his budget proposal was full of gimmickry. And these guys endorsed and supported Obama, too.

 

If Harley wasn’t over paying their unionized employees while over charging for an inferior (to an insurgent Japanese cruiser market) product, they they probably wouldn’t have needed the bailout in the first place.

 

But just that headline alone should be enough to scare you. How can you possibly reduce the deficit if you ALWAYS spend more than you take in?

© 2010 UrbanGrounds

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha